Wilk Auslander LLP

In the News || Legal News

The Dreaded U.S. Class Action Monster has Lost a Tooth
In a decision dated June 24, 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court held that Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 does not provide a cause of action to foreign plaintiffs for misconduct in connection with securities traded on a foreign exchange.  June 24 , 2010
[ full story ]

Notice about Protecting Trademarks on Facebook
You may have already read in the news that Facebook announced that its users will be permitted to create personalized usernames/brands for their Facebook pages.  It is a first-come/first-served basis starting 12:01 AM (Eastern time) Saturday, June 13, 2009.  June 23 , 2009
[ full story ]

Foreign Financial Account Reporting 2009 Update
U.S. persons (U.S. citizens, U.S. residents, and persons doing business in the U.S. including individuals, all forms of business entities, trusts and estates) with signature power or a financial interest in a foreign financial account which held more than $10,000 at any time in the prior year are required to file Form TD F 90-22.1 "Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts" by June 30 of each year for the prior year.  June 23 , 2009
[ full story (PDF) ]

Getting Stubbed: Collecting rent when tenant claims bankruptcy
With the number of retail bankruptcies increasing, the treatment for rent from the period from the date of the bankruptcy filing, through the end of that month, the so-called "stub" rent, can have a large economic impact on landlords and debtors. February 4, 2009
[ full story (PDF) ]

Memo: Recent Case on Arbitration
Arbitration has its uses, but as you may know from reading my prior memos, it also has more than its share of problems.  January 16, 2009
[ full story (PDF) ]

Memo: Recent Eleventh Circuit Decision on § 13D of the Williams Act
Just in time for the new year, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (the federal appellate court covering Georgia, Florida and Alabama) decided a case that clarifies who is required to file a Form 13D with the SEC as a member of a "group" that owns more than 5% of an issuer's stock.  January 16, 2009
[ full story (PDF) ]

SEC Proposes to Ease Restrictions on Resales of Restricted Securities and Private Placements
As part of a series of measures aimed at improving capital-raising by smaller companies, the Securities and Exchange Commission has recently proposed rule changes that will make it easier for investors to resell restricted securities into the public market and for public companies to sell their securities in private placements. 
[ full story ]

New Worrisome Development in Lease Payment Guarantee
Many Landlords rely on lease payment guarantees from the individual principals of a tenant entity that is leasing space. A recent case decided by the New York Appellate Division, First Department in Manhattan raises problems for landlords who rely on such guarantees. Madison Avenue Leasehold, LLC vs. Madison Bentley Associates LLC, ___ A.D.2d ___, 811 N.Y.S. 2d 47 (1st Dep’t March 14, 2006) (“Madison/Bentley”).
[ full story ]

U.S. Supreme Court Makes Avoiding Arbitration More Difficult
Earlier this year, the United States Supreme Court issued an important decision that will affect arbitrations in New York and throughout the United States. In Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v Cardegna, __ U.S.__, 126 S. Ct. 1204 (February 21, 2006), the Supreme Court held that, under the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C §1 et seq., the question of whether a contract that contains an arbitration provision is void is to be determined by the arbitrator, and not by a court, unless the challenge is to the validity of the arbitration provision itself. That means that a party will not be able to avoid arbitration by asserting that an arbitration clause is contained in an agreement that is void, unless the party can establish that the arbitration clause itself is unenforceable. Under the Supreme Court’s decision, the court should enforce the agreement to arbitrate and refer the question of the legality of the overall contract to the arbitrator.
[ full story ]

Second Circuit Clarifies Short-Swing Profit Rules as Applied To Options
Under § 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, directors, officers and 10% shareholders of public companies who, within six months, purchase and sell (or sell and purchase) securities of their company can be compelled to disgorge their profits on the transaction. In the words of § 16(b), this provision has “the purpose of preventing the unfair use of information which may have been obtained by such beneficial owner, director, or officer by reason of his relationship to the issuer.”
[ full story ]

Recovery Of Attorneys’ Fees in Landlord-Tenant Disputes
As a general rule in New York, a party to a litigation is not entitled to recover its attorneys’ fees unless the dispute involves a contract that provides for such recovery or an award of attorneys’ fees is authorized by statute. In the commercial landlord-tenant context, disputes concerning the right to recover attorneys’ fees are not uncommon, because many such leases contain an attorney fee provision. This article sets forth the circumstances in which such fees can be recovered as well as the procedures for doing so.
[ full story ]

Basic Tax Considerations in Choosing An Entity for a New Business
Every time an individual or entity establishes a new business or expands a business into a new location, one of the first decisions to be made is choosing the type of legal entity for the new business or location. The types of entities most often used are corporations, limited liability companies, corporations and limited partnerships. This article will briefly describe them and their basic advantages and disadvantages. The main considerations are minimizing taxes and minimizing the owners’ liability.
[ full story ]

Recent Developments in Estate Planning
"Transfer On Death" Securities Accounts; Attorney-Fiduciary Disclosure; Termination of an Uneconomically Small Trust.
[ full story ]

Selling Your Closely Held Business: What You Need to Do Before the Purchase Agreement Arrives
If you’ve ever thought of selling your closely held business, you’ve probably focused your attention on the terms that would be included in the purchase agreement, particularly the purchase price. In addition to how much you would receive, you may have thought about how it would be paid -- whether the purchase price would be paid in cash at the closing, or partially in cash with the remainder paid over time, or partially in cash and partially in stock of another company. You may have thought about whether you would sell for a specified, fixed amount, or whether there might be some additional “earnout” or “upside” based on the Company’s future performance. If you’ve been involved in a prior sale of a business or know people who have, you may even have given some thought to the other provisions of the purchase agreement, such as representations and warranties, and indemnification. But if you are seriously considering selling your closely held business and you’ve been thinking only about the purchase agreement, then you are getting way ahead of yourself.
[ full story ]

Protecting a Security Deposit Against the Risk of a Commercial Tenant's Bankruptcy
For quite some time we have been recommending to real estate owners, landlords or sublandlords that when they take a security deposit, it should be in the form of a letter of credit rather than cash. We gave this advice because, in our judgment, a letter of credit protects the landlord better than cash if the tenant files for bankruptcy. A recent decision by the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, Redbank Networks, Inc vs. Mayan Networks Corporation (In Re Mayan Networks Corporation) 42 BCD 196 (9th Civ. BAP 2004) (hereinafter the “Mayan Case”) has confirmed that our advice was correct, but also highlights some additional precautions the landlord should take in the letter of credit transaction.
[ full story ]

APPELLATE COURT REAFFIRMS APPLICATION OF SPECIAL RULE GOVERNING THE MEASURE OF DAMAGES IN CONTRACT CASES
A case our firm recently won in the New York Appellate Division, First Department, established that despite apparently contrary language in the Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC”), a plaintiff who sues for breach of contract for sale of goods cannot recover more than his actual damage from the breach.
[ full story ]

Archives >>